Tag: hulda clark

  • A Celebration of Hulda Clark, the Scientist

    A Celebration of Hulda Clark, the Scientist

    Today is the anniversary of Hulda Clark‘s birthday. She would have been 90 years old. She died on September 3, 2009 – just over a month shy of her 81st birthday. It would have been a ripe old age for her life and death to be celebrated if it weren’t for the controversy her death certificate caused: the author of a series of books beginning with “The Cure For All Cancers” died of cancer!

    I wrote Hulda Clark Cancer Mystery a few years back to unpack this ball of irony. How could she not cure herself? Did Hulda Clark die of cancer? Was she a fraud or the victim of a conspiracy by the medical community? With no biopsy prior to her death to confirm her diagnosis and no autopsy after it, we are left to simply believe. Not a scientific approach on either side of the debate.

    Recent news continue to tout “fake cancer zapper” and “bogus treatments” despite advances in science that are based on the foundation laid by Hulda Clark and her predecessors in frequency therapy: Nikola Tesla, Georges Lakhovsky, and Royal Rife. We would not have FDA-approved (and prescription-only) applications such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, and Frequency Specific Microcurrent without the Hulda Clark Zapper.

    It is clear that the Hulda Clark Zapper is being attacked by propaganda, not because it doesn’t work, but because it is registered in the public domain. The medical community cannot control its use. Anyone can build, use, and sell it. Essentially, the Hulda Clark Zapper is free, and while it’s free and circulating around the world without the need for a prescription, people hold the power of their health in their own hands.

    The medical community likes to label anything beyond their scope as “pseudoscience” while they insist that the public simply take their word for it. How many times have the FDA and medical community pushed drugs at us and then later recalled them? How many people have died from conventional therapies such as vaccines, chemo, and radiation?

    Hulda Clark always said, “Don’t take my word for it. Be your own scientist or detective.” Hulda Clark encouraged skepticism as the beginning of scientific investigation. Too many people giving Hulda Clark bad reviews are those who have never even tried her protocols. I don’t believe anyone who speaks from a lack of experience. Hulda Clark’s books and research are not perfect, but she laid in our hands the beginning of an exciting new paradigm in health care. We hold the keys to discovery and improvement.

    Books by Hulda Clark

  • Electricity for Longevity

    When I started using a Hulda Clark Zapper in 1996, I did so because I was curious. My father had given me a copy of Hulda Clark’s book, The Cure For All Diseases, and asked me to build him a zapper. The Radio Shack parts came in bundles, so I had enough parts to build three zappers. One for my dad, one for me, and I gave one to my grandparents.

    I used the zapper daily for several weeks, then once or twice a week as suggested in Dr. Clark’s book. I used the zapper any time I was exposed to a sick person, or felt down, myself. I quickly became a believer, using the zapper religiously for several years, turning many friends, family members, and co-workers onto the device. I made a zapper for anyone that would supply me with the parts to do so. Each one told me I should start a zapper business, and eventually I did found Natural Health Supply in 2001. After 5 years of first hand zapper experience I was excited to make a living sharing my little secret of the universe with others.

    Here I am writing this blog entry more than twenty years later. Now get this: I believe that I have practically stopped aging since I began zapping twenty plus years ago. I know lifestyle is a big part of it, too. I eat organic, don’t smoke, or take any prescription drugs. Beyond that however, I really think the zapper has helped me stay young and strong.

    If the zapper really does all that Dr. Hulda Clark writes about in her books, the device simply kills any common germ the electricity can reach. This releases the body from having to battle each and every daily germ, so your body stays a bit younger by being less burdened. If your immune system has less to do, it’s easier to stay healthy and spry. So the zapper is a “cure all” device, because in essence it simply takes unnecessary work away from your immune system so that your immune system can focus on getting rid of major illness, or disease. What’s super cool is that there are no side effects or drug interactions. Zapping is electrical. A zapper emits a radio frequency and the user holds two copper handles. The zapper current will travel to many parts of the body, mostly through the blood and lymph system because it is most conductive.

    The theory is that the zapper’s positive offset square wave frequency is enough to zap those little critters to death, and we cannot even feel it. No shock, no jolt. You feel nothing, that is, unless you’re a germ. By cleaning house in this manner on a routine basis, I believe I have kept my body the temple it deserves to be.

    Zapping was an unexpected discovery made by the scientist Nikola Tesla. While at work perfecting the early days of radio transmission he wrote that he had noticed painful cuts, scratches, and wounds with slight infections would clear up around certain frequencies. Tesla shared his discovery with contemporary Georges Lakhovsky, who used Tesla coils to make the cancer fighting device, the Multiple Wave Oscillator. Royal Raymond Rife added to the science by researching the exact frequencies each pathogen was killed by, charting the mortal oscillatory rate for disease causing germs. Some really smart people have spent their life working on electronic wellness devices, and I’m convinced from using them that they really do work wonders!

    So yeah, the zapper is a public domain device with over 100 years of history. It’s not approved by the FDA because public domain items cannot be patented, so mainstream medicine will not run a six hundred million dollar, ten year double blind study, any time soon. In Canada and Switzerland the zapper is sold over the counter without a prescription for post operative infection. Exactly as Tesla described it back in the 1800’s. In the United States the zapper falls under folk medicine but some universities have began conducting studies that shed positive light on using a zapper. You can only know if zapping works by using one yourself. Looking for that magic silver bullet to give you that added edge in life? Buy a zapper, or if you’re handy, build your own zapper. Experiment with it at home, and tell others about what you find out.

  • Ark Of The Covenant

    Baghdad Battery

    When watching the episode of Myth Busters about the Baghdad Battery and the Ark Of The Covenant, I was interested in hearing more about the ancient battery inside. The DC voltage from the battery is connected to the gold wings of the cherubim on top of the box so people could hold the conductive gold handles and feel the tingle. It is not known what the ancient batteries powered, so it may have been that simply feeling the tingle was magical, and perhaps even found to be medicinal.

    Dr. Hulda Clark’s Zapper is also powered by a DC battery pulsing at a frequency in order to bypass the body’s resistance. Once the voltage is pulsed, anywhere from 10-500,000 Hertz (pulses per second) the body’s resistance, or skin effect, is no longer an issue, and the voltage can penetrate the body.

    Since Dr. Clark wrote that the Zapper works from 5 volts to 12 volts DC, could the Ark Of The Covenant be some sort of early Zapper? Hulda Clark wrote in her books that Zappers kill bacteria and viruses, so ancient 5 volt batteries may have been used to do the same thing since they are in the range. When one imagines the stressful conditions of the wandering tribes of Israel, having a simple way to kill germs would be very beneficial, if that is what the Ark was used for.

    Other scientists have experimented with recreating the Ark and have received interesting electrical results. Sadly, the Myth Buster episode was called short due to a prank of hooking the device up to a one hundred thousand volt cattle prod harming Adam Savage, so the science of the episode was thrown out the window and got the pranking producer fired. I always wished they would revisit the myth in order to complete what they had started because it is an important and interesting part of our history.

    Because the Ark Of The Covenant is an important religious artifact, there are people that do not like studies being done on it. Whenever science attempts to define the holy and the divine some people are offended. I have noticed there seems to be a lot of sabotage on projects that try to recreate the device from the instructions found in the Bible. The Myth Buster episode was derailed, and John Hutchison’s documentary for the Discovery Channel was cancelled with the replica of the Ark being mysteriously destroyed by the carpenter who build it with no explanation as to why.

    Other interesting footnotes are that when the U.S. went into Iraq, the Baghdad Batteries were seized from the Baghdad Museum along with the clay tablets containing their information. Researching this history becomes more and more difficult since war makes archaeology nearly impossible. It seems that conducting research on the Ark Of The Covenant is polarizing in more ways than one.

  • Grampy’s win over lung and prostate cancer

    Grampy

    When I was a kid my grandfather was my favorite person ever. I loved growing up with his humor, mischief, and wisdom. Later in life when he was diagnosed with lung and prostate cancer I was very concerned. I had already read several books by Dr. Hulda Clark and built a few zappers, but Grampy’s cancer was the first time I was faced with a family member with cancer.

    Grampy had about seven sessions of radiation to the spot on his lungs that had the cancer. I had never seen anything wear him out so. He lost his voice and needed time to recuperate from the radiation slowly getting his breath and voice back.

    He refused chemotherapy for the prostate cancer, and instead decided to take Hulda Clark’s Herbal Parasite Cleanse and use a Zapper daily. He did not keep up with the herbs because he didn’t like to swallow so many pills, and instead took only the black walnut hull tincture. He zapped pretty much every night while watching TV. Wheel Of Fortune, Jeopardy, and America’s Funniest Videos were zapping time for Grampy.

    He won his bout with cancer, and 5 years later the VA Hospital invited him to a “I Cured My Cancer Picnic”. He lived the rest of his life cancer free, zapping at least weekly, and eventually about 12 years later died in his sleep at 83 years old. This is my video testimonial about the incredible story of an incredible man who beat cancer.

  • US Patent #5188738

    Alternating current supplied electrically conductive method and system for treatment of blood and/or other body fluids and/or synthetic fluids with electric forces.

    US Patent 5188738

    Steven Kaali and Peter M. Schwolsky working with Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. New York received US Patent # 5188738 for their invention of a Zapper-like device, “… to provide electric current flow through the blood or other body fluids at a magnitude that is biologically compatible but is sufficient to render the bacteria, virus, parasites and/or fungus ineffective to infect or affect normally healthy cells…”

    Science is a strange world. Studies can take up to 10 years, and often only lead to a conclusion that more study should be done. When research scientists discover something it could take decades, or several lifetimes for the science to make it into the mainstream. The common person may never hear about breakthroughs in science.

    Science may discover that an herb has cancer killing qualities, or that electricity or certain frequencies can disrupt cancer cells, but until they can figure out WHY, the science is not done. The research will go on and on. Frustrated by this exact sort of thing, Dr. Hulda Clark left government funded research and decided to publish her findings in her books.

    Doing such a thing was blasphemous to the scientific community. Research should always lead to more research. That is how research scientists make their living. For Dr. Hulda Clark to publish directly so that you and I can immediately benefit from Dr. Clark’s herbal parasite cleanse and zapper was a very bold move on Dr. Clark’s part.

    Hulda Clark published most of her books while in her late 70’s. In Dr. Clark’s HIV/AIDS book (see page 591: The Story of L-G) she wrote that during her lifetime she battled with her own “incurable” disease, a rare form of infection that had gotten into her eyes and was crossing the blood brain barrier giving her brain herpes. Medical doctors have no cure for herpes, so Hulda Clark had to venture out into the world of alternative medicine and discover answers to extend her life.

    Hulda Clark discovered ways to boost her immune system with herbs, minerals, amino acids, and electronic frequencies. All her research started her on the path that made her famous as an author and led to the invention of the Hulda Clark Zapper. She was able to do the impossible and cure herself from a disease that she had been told was going to eventually blind and kill her. When faced with her own disease, her enthusiasm for discovering solutions brought her to writing her books and using her methods to help others. By publishing several ways to boost the immune system Dr. Clark helped many people. The testimonials and book reviews show how much of an impact her books have.

    Scientists may take a long time to research their discoveries, but when something looks promising, they quickly protect their discovery by requesting a patent. The above patent more than likely was inspired by the work of Royal Rife and Georges Lakhovsky, and in turn inspired the Zappers made by scientists like Bob Beck, Hulda Clark, and others. The best thing is that Hulda Clark’s Zapper was published to the Public Domain, so you can build or buy a zapper today. You don’t have to wait several decades for more research to be done.

  • Several 5 Star Reviews

    Books by Hulda Clark

    I spent the evening reading Customer Reviews of Dr. Hulda Clark’s books.

    Healthcare is a strange world. In no other area do those without experience seem to voice their opinion more. If your car stopped working, people who have no experience with cars never tell you how to fix it. That would be insane.

    While reading the book reviews I noticed two groups of people: Those who have read the book and received results from following the instructions, and the group of people who refuse to even try anything found in the book, or even read the book. Many of these people write well and seem educated, so when did it become OK for them to speak from inexperience? When did the opinion of those who do not try something ever matter? It’s not even a review at that point.

    All I care about is hearing a review from those who did follow the advice in the book, and the story of how it went. That’s the information that helps people. The only way to know if Dr. Clark’s Herbal Parasite Cleanse and Zapper works for you is to try it. Experience is a great teacher. Check out the reviews from those who read and applied the information found in Dr. Hulda Clark’s books here.

  • Plant Power


    Here it is Springtime and flowers are blooming and trees are budding all around us. After a long winter, it’s an amazing sight to see. My family and I routinely do our Herbal Parasite Cleanse this time of year. We take Black Walnut Hull, Wormwood, and Cloves during an 18 day cleanse. We get out for daily walks to get some sun and breathe the fresh air. Winter on the east coast has us stuck inside for most of the time and this winter was a doozy. While ordering my herbs to do our cleanse, I did a few Google searches to see what kind of scientific research has been done as of late on these herbs. I think a lot of scientists read Dr. Hulda Clark’s books to get ideas on what to study next. None of the studies mention her name, and they always want to do more research to make a patent medicine or drug out of the herb, but it’s still interesting to see their results. Check out the video above to see how science is just now finding out what Dr. Clark published for us all back in 1993.

    Herbal Parasite Cleanse

  • Science catches up to Hulda Clark

    I have been seeing a lot of science articles that support Hulda Clark’s theories. Dr. Clark believed that most disease is caused by a combination of pollutants and parasites. Hulda Clark believed that by removing pollutants and parasites, the immune system is free to fight and win over disease. Hulda Clark goes after parasites using an Herbal Parasite Cleanse in combination with an electronic device called a Clark Zapper to electrocute the little buggers. Dr. Clark first published these findings in 1993, and lately many of her ideas are showing up in scientific studies.

    I would like to start out with one cancer study using an actual Hulda Clark Zapper:

    Low-intensity electric current-induced effects on human lymphocytes and leukemia cells

    Narendra P. Singh and Henry Lai
    Department of Bioengineering
    University of Washington
    Seattle, WA
    USA

    The purpose of this study is to investigate whether low-intensity current affects cells in culture. Two types of human cells: white blood cells (lymphocytes) and leukemia cells (molt-4 cells), were studied. A low-intensity time-varying electric current (0.14 milliamp) generated by the Clark Zapper was applied to cell cultures via two platinum electrodes for 2 hrs at 37o C. Cell counts were made at different times after electric current application. Results show that the current had no significant effect on human white blood cells up to 24 hrs after exposure, whereas it significantly inhibited the growth of leukemia cells. At 24 hrs after exposure, concentration of leukemia cells exposed to the electric current was only 58% of that of non-exposed leukemia cells. These data suggest that the electric current can selectively inhibit the growth of leukemia cells and does not significantly affect normal cells. A manuscript describing these results is in preparation for publication. In addition, the same electric current exposure (0.14 milliamp, 2 hrs at 37oC) was applied to E. coli bacteria cultures. No significant effect of the current was observed in E. coli cultures at 24 hrs after exposure.

    Further research should investigate whether this selective electric current-induced growth inhibition also occurs in other types of cancer cells. The critical current parameters and mechanism of this effect should also be investigated.

    Dr. Singh and Lai went on further with electromagnetic field (EMF) research studying malaria and cancer. Here is an excerpt from that study:

    Medical applications of electromagnetic fields

    This concept has been tested in vitro on malaria parasites and found to be effective. This may provide a low cost effective treatment for malaria infection in humans. The rationale for cancer treatment using low-intensity EMF is based on two concepts that have been well established in the literature: (1) low-intensity non-thermal EMF enhances cytotoxic free radicals via the iron-mediated Fenton reaction; and (2) cancer cells have higher amounts of free iron, thus are more susceptible to the cytotoxic effects of EMF. Since normal cells contain minimal amount of free iron, the effect would be selectively targeting cancer cells. Thus, no adverse side effect would be expected as in traditional chemotherapy and radiation therapy. This concept has also been tested on human cancer cell and normal cells in vitro and proved to be feasible.

    Here is an excerpt from a massive study conducted by the Department of Biomedical Engineering, NovoCure Ltd., Haifa, Israel; B. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel; and Elisha Medical Centre, Haifa, Israel.

    Disruption of Cancer Cell Replication by Alternating Electric Fields

    In the present study we show for the first time, to our knowledge, that very low-intensity (<2 V/cm), intermediate-frequency (100–300 kHz), alternating electric fields induced by insulated electrodes have specific inhibitory effects on dividing cells in culture. We demonstrate that applying these fields to cancerous cells leads to proliferation arrest and cell destruction. When applied to syngeneic mice tumor models, these tumor treating fields (TTFields) cause a significant reduction in tumor growth rate without any significant side effects.

    In conclusion, we have demonstrated that TTFields inhibit both the proliferation of malignant cells in culture and the growth of tumors in mice while showing no general side effects or local histopathological damage. The mechanism of action of the fields is, at least in part, dependent on disruption of the microtubules of the mitotic spindle and the electric forces resulting from focusing of the field in the dividing cells. The highly specific effects of these fields on dividing cells, together with the relative ease of applying them, focusing them, and screening from them, make them an attractive candidate to serve as a novel treatment modality for cancer.

    Dr. Robert Thiel did a study using Hulda Clark Zappers with a remarkable 97.9 % success rate. Here are a few excerpts from that study:

    Bioelectrical Stimulation for People with Patterns Consistent with Certain Chronic Infections

    The purpose of this pilot trial was to determine whether there may be any efficacy to combining the use of bioelectrical stimulating units with nutritional interventions for people with patterns consistent with chronic fungal, bacterial, viral, or parasitic infections. This trial was a pretest-posttest, natural control-group design where subjects were assessed before and after bioelectrical stimulation was introduced by the use of a device, most commonly referred to as a zapper. 140 of 143 (97.9%) participants reported improvement within 45 days, P<.01; 48.2% improved substantially and 49.7% improved minimally. Thus, it appears that combining bioelectrical stimulation with nutritional interventions may have efficacy and deserves further study.

    There are several reasons to believe that there may be scientific justification for the use of zappers. First, it needs to be understood that precisely how the body combats parasitic infections is not fully known; this may be because many of the disease causing parasites have the ability to turn off immune responses. (Both immune and non-immune responses are involved in the body’s defenses against pathogens of all types.) It is possible that the body produces additional acid, has an IgG response, or has other actions to deal with intestinal parasites. Second, it needs to be understood that both the colon and the small intestine produce electrical spike bursts. Third, animal studies support the hypothesis that electrical stimulation has various effects on the body, including the inactivation of muscle acetyl CoA carboxylase and increasing AMP-activated protein kinase. The inactivation of muscle acetyl CoA carboxylase may temporarily increase pyruvic acid or decrease the effectiveness of normal portions of the immune system. It has been reported that researchers from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine found that passing a current of only 50 microamps can prevent certain viruses (including HIV) from replicating.

    In 2009, sixteen years after Hulda Clark first published that parasites can cause cancer, the Queensland Institute of Medical Research publishes:

    Parasite turns cells cancerous

    Scientists have found that the human liver fluke (Opisthorchis viverrini) contributes to the development of liver cancer by secreting granulin, a growth hormone that is known to cause uncontrolled cell growth.

    “It has been known that certain proteins secreted by O. viverrini cause cell growth, however the identity of the protein was unknown. We also knew that the parasite secreted granulin but we did not know that it could affect the human cells around it,” said Dr Loukas.

    “This discovery leads the way to a better understanding of how this parasite causes such a devastating form of cancer,” said Dr. Loukas.

    It is now thought that the granulin secreted by the parasite is a major contributing factor to developing bile duct cancer.

    Dr. Henry Lai, who conducted the Hulda Clark Zapper study also did a study on the herbs found in Dr. Clark’s Herbal Parasite Cleanse. The herb Wormwood is studied for it’s medicinal compound: artemisinin.

    Targeted treatment of cancer with artemisinin

    Artemisinin is a chemical compound that reacts with iron to form free radicals which can kill cells. Cancer cells require and uptake a large amount of iron to proliferate. They are more susceptible to the cytotoxic effect of artemisinin than normal cells. Cancer cells express a large concentration of cell surface transferrin receptors that facilitate uptake of the plasma iron-carrying protein transferrin via endocytosis. By covalently tagging artemisinin to transferrin, artemisinin could be selectively picked up and concentrated by cancer cells. Futhermore, both artemisinin and iron would be transported into the cell in one package. Once an artemisinin-tagged transferrin molecule is endocytosed, iron is released and reacts with artemisinin moieties tagged to transferrin. Formation of free radicals kills the cancer cell. The authors have found that artemisinin-tagged transferrin is highly selective and potent in killing cancer cells. Thus, artemisinin and artemisinin-tagged iron-carrying compounds could be developed into powerful anticancer drugs.

    So enough of all the scientific studies with all those big confusing words. Get an easy to read book by Dr. Hulda Clark and read up on all the stuff science is just starting to figure out. All this research is in its infancy. Your doctor won’t hear about any of this stuff during your life time because it’s not being taught in medical school yet. If you have cancer you will only be offered chemotherapy and radiation. It will take decades for the medical world to embrace all these breakthroughs, but you don’t have to wait. Read a book by Hulda Clark now. Try the Herbal Parasite Cleanse. If you’re handy with electronics, build a Handmade Zapper. If building a Zapper from scratch is not your thing buy a Hulda Clark Zapper. See if it works for you. You will never know until you try. I believe we’re all mad scientists, and life is one long experiment.

  • NSF Bleach for Drinking Water

    Corlox the Bleach Monster

     

    Laundry bleach is not intended to treat drinking water. If you have a well or pump house, be sure to find a source for American National Standards Institute/National Sanitation Foundation (ANSI/NSF) Standard 60 certified drinking water treatment chemicals. Pool supply stores often have NSF Standard 60 Chlorine Bleach and non-chlorine water treatment chemicals. The NSF Standard 60 Chlorine Bleach does not foam up in pools because it’s pure sodium hypochlorite without the added chemicals found in most laundry bleaches. Laundry bleaches can have added chemical whiteners such as phosphorus which is radio active, so you don’t want to be drinking that! Other issues with laundry bleach are chemicals like Methylene Blue, Bromate, Perchlorate, and Chlorate, all known to be toxic or major carcinogens. Never use scented laundry bleach to treat water even in emergency situations, it’s toxic.

    With municipal water treatment, using NSF Standard 60 is the law, but many do not know the law. It could be that up to 50% of local water systems still use household bleach brands not knowing that not all bleach products are the same. Laundry bleach is not pure bleach, so be sure to look for the NSF logo found on the back of the bottle. Hopefully the pump house in your area is aware and using the proper water treatment chemicals. If you have city water, phone them up and ask what brand they use, and if it is rated NSF Standard 60. Once aware of the concerns, most will adhere to proper procedure. The proper bleach does not cost any more, so it’s all a matter of finding a source and using the pure product to disinfect your drinking water.